<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Tools on Manuj Gupta</title><link>https://manujg.com/tags/tools/</link><description>Recent content in Tools on Manuj Gupta</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://manujg.com/tags/tools/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>What LabVIEW Taught Me in 2005 That Made AI Feel Familiar</title><link>https://manujg.com/posts/what-labview-taught-me/</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://manujg.com/posts/what-labview-taught-me/</guid><description>&lt;p>When people talk about AI feeling like a revolution, I get it. The speed, the way you just describe what you want and something working comes out the other end — it really is impressive.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>But honestly, for me it also feels like something I have seen before. And I think I know why.&lt;/p>
&lt;h3 id="2005-a-turbine-monitoring-system-and-one-integration-block">2005, a Turbine Monitoring System, and One Integration Block&lt;/h3>
&lt;p>Early in my career I spent a lot of time with MATLAB, Simulink, and LabVIEW. LabVIEW was the one that stuck — mostly because I figured it out myself on a live project, which I think is why it left such a strong impression.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>